05.12.09
reagan
Props to RR: he signed the UN Convention Against Torture. We had our differences, he and I. But on this particular subject, we are in perfect agreement. I looked around for a reference to his signing statement and part of it is unequivocal:
The United States participated actively and effectively in the negotiation of the Convention. It marks a significant step in the development during this century of international measures against torture and other inhuman treatment or punishment. Ratification of the Convention by the United States will clearly express United States opposition to torture, an abhorrent practice unfortunately still prevalent in the world today.
The core provisions of the Convention establish a regime for international cooperation in the criminal prosecution of torturers relying on so-called ‘universal jurisdiction.’ Each State Party is required either to prosecute torturers who are found in its territory or to extradite them to other countries for prosecution.
I’m sold, except for the part where he says the US has the right to decide upon the competence of the Committee Against Torture to investigate torture in the US; it is analogous to giving the accused the right to decide the competence of the district attorney. But I’ll forgive him that par-for-the-course resistance to outside oversight that has been typical of US foreign policy for several generations in light of his opposition to the practice of torture.
I don’t know if Reagan ever thought about a “ticking time-bomb” terror attack scenario, but I am pretty sure he thought of that in a military context. Maybe he knew that, as happened with Ibn al-Sheikh al-Libi, we are as likely as not to deceive ourselves with our own lies when we do it.